Issue 1212: Which licenses? - GRML issue tracker

Created on 2012-09-24.18:00:22 by Mikko.Viinamaki, last changed 2012-11-26.21:49:57 by bionix.

Messages
msg4475 (view)	Author: bionix	Date: 2012-11-26.21:49:47
The wish feature is online - http://grml.org/files/.
msg4473 (view)	Author: bionix	Date: 2012-11-25.23:42:00
The issue with the licence files for the website is open. I will make the license lists in the next days.
msg4466 (view)	Author: evgeni	Date: 2012-09-26.17:18:04
https://github.com/grml/grml-live/commit/64025b9c5a39c18bb1ba244015375edd78f13263 is in grml-live/master, now the website bits :)
msg4464 (view)	Author: Mikko.Viinamaki	Date: 2012-09-25.20:01:01
Evgeni Golov <evgeni@grml.org> added the comment: Hi, I have pushed a possible fix for this to https://github.com/evgeni/grml-live/compare/list_nonfree_licenses an example output (from 2012.05-full-amd64) can be found here: http://chi.die-welt.net/~evgeni/tmp/nonfree-licenses.txt Would providing such files for each release/ISO on http://grml.org/files/ fix the issue for you? _____________________________________ GRML issue tracker <bts@bts.grml.org> <http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1212> _____________________________________ Hi Evgeni! That and a mention on the frontpage of the project would be a perfect fix. Just so people know their rights. Mikko
msg4463 (view)	Author: evgeni	Date: 2012-09-25.18:07:21
Hi, I have pushed a possible fix for this to https://github.com/evgeni/grml-live/compare/list_nonfree_licenses an example output (from 2012.05-full-amd64) can be found here: http://chi.die-welt.net/~evgeni/tmp/nonfree-licenses.txt Would providing such files for each release/ISO on http://grml.org/files/ fix the issue for you?
msg4462 (view)	Author: Mikko.Viinamaki	Date: 2012-09-25.09:39:27
Proprietary firmware is proprietary. vrms is very incomplete and misleading since it's named after rms, yet it follows the dfsg... The bug is the lack of licensing info on the homepage. ________________________________________ From: Michael Prokop [bts@bts.grml.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:08 AM To: Mikko V. Viinamäki Subject: [issue1212] Which licenses? Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org> added the comment: No, Grml doesn't contain proprietary software (unless your definition of proprietary software contains some selected firmware packages from non-free, install vrms and see yourselve). PS: This is a bug tracker :) ---------- priority: -> wish status: unread -> resolved _____________________________________ GRML issue tracker <bts@bts.grml.org> <http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1212> _____________________________________
msg4460 (view)	Author: mika	Date: 2012-09-24.21:08:31
No, Grml doesn't contain proprietary software (unless your definition of proprietary software contains some selected firmware packages from non-free, install vrms and see yourselve). PS: This is a bug tracker :)
msg4459 (view)	Author: Mikko.Viinamaki	Date: 2012-09-24.18:00:21
Hi! Does grml contain proprietary software? I couldn't find any hint about this on the home page. Please advice. Mikko

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-26 21:49:57	bionix	set	status: chatting -> resolved
2012-11-26 21:49:47	bionix	set	messages: + msg4475
2012-11-25 23:42:00	bionix	set	messages: + msg4473
2012-09-26 17:18:04	evgeni	set	messages: + msg4466
2012-09-25 20:01:01	Mikko.Viinamaki	set	messages: + msg4464
2012-09-25 18:07:21	evgeni	set	messages: + msg4463
2012-09-25 09:39:27	Mikko.Viinamaki	set	status: resolved -> chatting messages: + msg4462
2012-09-24 21:08:31	mika	set	status: unread -> resolved priority: wish messages: + msg4460
2012-09-24 18:00:22	Mikko.Viinamaki	create

Issue1212