BTS

Issue925

Title grml-x should have sane defaults (no need to specify a window manager)
Priority wish Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List mru
Assigned To mru Topics

Created on 2010-11-07.10:59:43 by mru, last changed 2010-12-14.10:18:16 by mika.

Messages
msg3630 (view) Author: mika Date: 2010-12-14.10:18:16
Closing this one, AFAICT this works as expected nowadays.
msg3545 (view) Author: mika Date: 2010-12-02.00:29:09
* Ulrich Dangel wrote in grml's BTS on 20101202 / 01:20:

> > Are we sure about that? Opinions?

> ch discovered that it should be already the default x-window-manager, so
> yes we are sure about it ;0.

> See ./etc/grml/fai/config/scripts/GRMLBASE/90-update-alternatives in
> grml-live

I'm not talking about the x-window-manager stuff but whether grml-x
requires a window manager option or not. Or did I misunderstand:

| IMHO there is no need that grml-x foreces the user to specify a window manager. 
| We should just use wm-ng as default and make it optional to specify a window 
| manager

?

regards,
-mika-
msg3544 (view) Author: uli1 Date: 2010-12-02.00:20:35
* Michael Prokop wrote [01.12.10 23:20]:
Hi,
> 
> Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org> added the comment:
> 
> Are we sure about that? Opinions?

ch discovered that it should be already the default x-window-manager, so
yes we are sure about it ;0.

See ./etc/grml/fai/config/scripts/GRMLBASE/90-update-alternatives in
grml-live

Ulrich
msg3537 (view) Author: mika Date: 2010-12-01.22:20:37
Are we sure about that? Opinions?
msg3439 (view) Author: mru Date: 2010-11-07.10:59:43
IMHO there is no need that grml-x foreces the user to specify a window manager. 
We should just use wm-ng as default and make it optional to specify a window 
manager
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-14 10:18:16mikasetstatus: chatting -> resolved
messages: + msg3630
2010-12-02 00:29:09mikasetmessages: + msg3545
2010-12-02 00:20:36uli1setmessages: + msg3544
2010-12-01 22:20:37mikasetmessages: + msg3537
2010-11-07 10:59:43mrucreate