http://paste.grml.org/644 for vfat.
Works as expected, closing with ACK from bugreporter (Christian).

Just checked how this looks like:

  http://paste.grml.org/643

Isn't this what you'd expect to get?
Is there anything what needs to be changed?

regards
-mika-

Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org> added the comment:
> * Christian Hofstaedtler wrote in grml's BTS on 20110320 / 13:11:
>> It's more common than we thought that this occurs. (Esp. on auto-partitioned disks
>> (RH Installer...) or prop. OSes.)
>
> Yeah.
>
> But multiple identical labels won't work (that's why just for the
> first label the label entry is used and all the others should fall
> back to safe defaults) - so what's the proper solution?
> Don't use labels if there are more of the same type?

I guess so. We will have to see how we can actually do that.
Maybe we should just put the device name in /etc/fstab and add a
comment with the label...

  -ch

* Christian Hofstaedtler wrote in grml's BTS on 20110320 / 13:11:

> grml-rebuildfstab only adds the first partition with a particular label to 
> /etc/fstab.

Jepp.

> It's more common than we thought that this occurs. (Esp. on auto-partitioned disks 
> (RH Installer...) or prop. OSes.)

Yeah.

But multiple identical labels won't work (that's why just for the
first label the label entry is used and all the others should fall
back to safe defaults) - so what's the proper solution?
Don't use labels if there are more of the same type?

regards,
-mika-

grml-rebuildfstab only adds the first partition with a particular label to 
/etc/fstab.
It's more common than we thought that this occurs. (Esp. on auto-partitioned disks 
(RH Installer...) or prop. OSes.)