Alexander Steinböck <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> Alexander Steinböck <z3ttacht@grml.org> added the comment:
> * Frank Terbeck <bts@bts.grml.org> [2008-01-22 12:43]:
> > > Alexander Steinböck <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> > Also, if you want this function to be included in the
> > grml-zsh-refcard, add an appropriate tag in front of it.
> 
> Do I? (o; I was assuming, another instance - as in you or mika -
> decides what's mentioned in the refcard. Is that function important
> enough for it?
> But, I'll be happy to do that.

Well.
I think we should add everything to the refcard.
*As* *long* *as* it does not blow up beyond the size of two a4 pages.
But since we are able to generate the refcard automatically,
everything should be added (and I mean everything, also the functions,
that are currently not on it - minus the utility functions only used
by the zshrc itself); And when it reaches beyond two a4 pages, we can
revise which functions are not important enough, so we can leave them
out.

> > And last but not least: Do we want this function in etc/zsh/zshrc or
> > in etc/skel/.zshrc?
> 
> As mentioned in the diff, I was going for etc/skel/.zshrc. So, it
> would be just available for normal users. Don't know, does it give
> advantages to a root account as well?

No, fine. I would place it in .zshrc, too.

Regards, Frank

-- 
In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
                                                  -- RFC 1925