Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>:
> Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>:
> > Michael Prokop <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> > > grml-scripts always is a bit problematic in regards to dependencies,
> > > we should work on better splitouts. AFAIK someone is working on a
> > > Debian package for arename already, right?
> [...]
> > I might do it myself, if he doesn't move until next month. This month
> > is packed with work. There is no way I can do it now.
[...]
> I just uploaded a snapshot .tar.gz file for arename.pl and a .diff.gz,
> that contains initial (and also quick-and-dirty) debian packaging.
> 
> It's not lintian clean.
> And I don't know if this is the way a perl program should be packaged
> in Debian. The resulting .deb looks well enough, though.
[...]

Let's say, I might be able to do get the above working with the newest
version of the script (no promises, as always). How would you expect
me to go about it? Would you want to create a new repo on hg.grml.org
or do you prefer orig.tar.gz + debian.diff.gz?

Ooor, would you rather wait for this to be in debian? Which would be
okay by me, too. Just that it might never happen. :-)


Anyway, the current broken state of the script in grml should be dealt
with; which means, it should be removed from grml-scripts at least.

Regards, Frank

-- 
In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
                                                  -- RFC 1925