On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Tong Sun <suntong001@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, are you using 256K block size when creating squashfs modules?
> According to Tomas from Slax, this is the best setting to get smaller
> module size while maintaining good speed.

Quoting from Tomas:

* Here is an overview what great results can be achieved using bigger blocks:
  http://blog.slax.org/2007/11/02/mksquashfs-lzma-block-sizes-comparison/

* And here is described how it affects the speed of the system:
  http://blog.slax.org/2007/11/08/rc7-done-but-offline/

It appears on my computer that block size 256KB is the best compromise
between speed and size (the ISO is 13MB smaller! and boot takes only 4
seconds longer),

Ref:

http://lontra.org/pub/Linux/slax/SLAX-6.x/rc7/README