On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:32:07PM +0000, Frank Terbeck wrote:

> I've been asked to comment on this, so here goes:
> I am firmly against adding a wrapper around something that works,
> which requires a certain implementation of the given command and
> only works in certain scenarios (e.g. in a certain locale). And
> especially when its only purpose is to correct some cosmetic
> issues (if you'd even call it an issue).
> 
> Feel free to add this to your .zshrc.local file. IMO, this issue
> should be marked wont-fix for the reasons I gave earlier. (Unless,
> of course, I'm out-voted by a large number of fellow grml-developers.)

Well, fwiw, grml already has such wrappers (this is one of the things that
make it appealing). For example, ls is by default aliased to:

ls='ls -b -CF --color=auto'

I don't see how this is any different.

But I'd be happy with DF() instead of df() if you really think modifying
ls(1) is OK but modifying df(1) isn't. :)

-- 
 Andras Korn <korn at elan.rulez.org> - <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/>
                Energizer Bunny arrested. Charged with battery.