* Andreas Heinlein wrote in grml's BTS on 20141118 / 11:08:

> the file itself verifies OK. What confused me is that I somehow thought
> that the line
> "Hash: SHA256" were to indicate that the following line contains the
> SHA256SUM of grml96-full_2014.11.iso, while it actually contains the
> SHA1SUM. But after reading it a second time, I guess this is actually a
> hint from gpg which hash sum was used for the signature.

Ahhh, now I see what you mean, this is indeed confusing. :)

> Sorry about that.

No problem at all, better safe than sorry. Thanks for taking care!

regards,
-mika-