We believe that your issue has been closed by the upload of
Version 0.3.37 of grml-etc-core from Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>.
The explanation is attached below

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:06:21 +0200
Source: grml-etc-core
Binary: grml-etc-core
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.37
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
Changed-By: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
Description: 
 grml-etc-core - core ecetera files for the grml system
Changes: 
 grml-etc-core (0.3.37) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [Frank Terbeck]
   * Refactor /etc/grml/lsb-functions and /etc/grml/script-functions
     [Closes: issue291]
Files: 
 650643c28b33d2210297eb3752388807 596 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.37.dsc
 e144065a31069f7a0199f1861af8b2a6 90660 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.37.tar.gz
 3832729a3b7cb699f18faeaf11d27bad 92328 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.37_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHji52N9T+zficugRAjwEAJ0aMnlhmPqdvPq82sDnTo0/OW7s6gCffze0
vjJCf1p3aaRTNkMjE/mjzmI=
=u2wT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

* Frank Terbeck <bts@bts.grml.org> [20071006 13:40]:
> Michael Prokop <bts@bts.grml.org>:

> > Frank, I think we can close this bug report now (as you have implemented all 
> > the necessary changes already and they seem to work without any problems, 
> > thanks!), right?

> Well, IIRC we wanted to move the e*() functions to a different file
> than lsb-functions. That's not done yet. Also, the code could use a
> final review. Nothing serious, though.

> If you think it's appropriate already, I'm not against closing this
> one. But we *could* wait until the code is moved to the other file,
> and that change gets tested.

> I'll see if I can get some time to do that next week.
> So, it's your call: Close it now, or wait until I get my ass up and
> finish the work. ;-) - You decide.

Ah right, thanks for reminding. :) I'll leave the bug report open of
course therefore so we don't forget it. :)

regards,
-mika-

Michael Prokop <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> Frank, I think we can close this bug report now (as you have implemented all 
> the necessary changes already and they seem to work without any problems, 
> thanks!), right?

Well, IIRC we wanted to move the e*() functions to a different file
than lsb-functions. That's not done yet. Also, the code could use a
final review. Nothing serious, though.

If you think it's appropriate already, I'm not against closing this
one. But we *could* wait until the code is moved to the other file,
and that change gets tested.

I'll see if I can get some time to do that next week.
So, it's your call: Close it now, or wait until I get my ass up and
finish the work. ;-) - You decide.

Regards, Frank

Frank, I think we can close this bug report now (as you have implemented all 
the necessary changes already and they seem to work without any problems, 
thanks!), right?

Checking this into the bug tracker, for reference.