Created on 2009-09-21.01:40:42 by abe, last changed 2009-10-14.07:31:19 by mika.
msg2506 (view) |
Author: mika |
Date: 2009-10-14.07:31:13 |
|
We believe that your issue has been closed by the upload of
Version 0.3.76 of grml-etc-core from Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>.
The explanation is attached below
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:26:37 +0200
Source: grml-etc-core
Binary: grml-etc-core
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.76
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
Changed-By: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
Description:
grml-etc-core - core ecetera files for the grml system
Changes:
grml-etc-core (0.3.76) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Frank Terbeck ]
* zshrc: add openssl hash functions [Closes: issue741]
* zshrc: use history-incremental-pattern-search-* for incremental history
searches per default (via ^r and ^s).
* zshrc: actively do 'setopt unset'
Checksums-Sha1:
ad5f590a26323256b2c93199a938bb94a5fb6240 869 grml-etc-core_0.3.76.dsc
a0ce32f7da3f75fabba3f5f41fba72fd133097bf 113565 grml-etc-core_0.3.76.tar.gz
06a76b55d5ba3153391a2a911b5322b1e8fe8f0f 117024 grml-etc-core_0.3.76_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ea9b8c2ebda6668b0f0e92d775dc504ce3d683928b51c44eb1e4b75f1020955b 869 grml-etc-core_0.3.76.dsc
5ccbe2677053b2994a86f6d5f4b465758a4c3dc1d5b8d9d2bfd71e40c17e960d 113565 grml-etc-core_0.3.76.tar.gz
9a13cbcd98b001b49a8c5661c31c3297533760bc50db65ea85bc6d1165962068 117024 grml-etc-core_0.3.76_all.deb
Files:
b4ce91ade95d522cdbae76baf1d3b0f2 869 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.76.dsc
d1384e631c434ad24a5716d8914db03a 113565 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.76.tar.gz
e5fba4e248fad503d9097358413a0621 117024 grml optional grml-etc-core_0.3.76_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFK1X1a2N9T+zficugRAlpDAJ4zMyFc24WfzXDdPGKLN5mj6P1p+wCeLV95
mp80OKdY9PlCwDo3vStVRr4=
=BaK+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
msg2495 (view) |
Author: abe |
Date: 2009-09-21.12:18:35 |
|
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Frank Terbeck wrote:
> Also, I would like new stuff to go in only with accompanying
> documentation in doc/grmlzshrc.t2t of grml-etc-core's zshrc5 branch.
>
> Someone who knows what the functions from this patch actually do
> should write entries for them.
Done and attached. Hope it's fine.
Regards, Axel
--
Axel Beckert - abe@deuxchevaux.org, abe@noone.org - http://noone.org/abe/
|
msg2494 (view) |
Author: ft |
Date: 2009-09-21.11:28:52 |
|
From 93f4d32d511a3ad59628ec014ede589e33776f7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:21:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] zshrc: add openssl hash functions
Initially written by mika@grml.org, fixed up a little by me.
---
Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>:
> Michael Prokop <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> > Frank, can you please review? Maybe we should add some simple usage information
> > if $1 is missing?
[...]
>
> I'd do it like this:
[...]
Well, here's what I got in my repo now.
I'll happily push it, if people *test* and ACK this. - I didn't test
this!
Also, I would like new stuff to go in only with accompanying
documentation in doc/grmlzshrc.t2t of grml-etc-core's zshrc5 branch.
Someone who knows what the functions from this patch actually do
should write entries for them.
The guy who already writes the manual entries for the *existing* code
shouldn't be burdened with documenting *new* code, too.
So: Pretty please. :-)
Regards, Frank
debian/changelog | 6 ++++++
etc/zsh/zshrc | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 020f1fc..35be720 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+grml-etc-core (0.3.76) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * zshrc: add openssl hash functions
+
+ -- Frank Terbeck <ft@grml.org> Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:20:36 +0200
+
grml-etc-core (0.3.75) unstable; urgency=low
[ Frank Terbeck ]
diff --git a/etc/zsh/zshrc b/etc/zsh/zshrc
index c7ddace..0cd52bd 100644
--- a/etc/zsh/zshrc
+++ b/etc/zsh/zshrc
@@ -2985,6 +2985,42 @@ exit 0;
return $?
}
+ssl_hashes=( sha512 sha256 sha1 md5 )
+
+for sh in ${ssl_hashes}; do
+ ssl-cert-${sh}() {
+ emulate -L zsh
+ if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
+ printf 'usage: %s <hash-name>\n' "ssh-cert-${sh}"
+ printf ' where "hash-name" is one of: %s\n' "${ssl_hashes}"
+ return 1
+ fi
+ openssl x509 -noout -fingerprint -${sh} -in $1
+ }
+done; unset sh
+
+ssl-cert-fingerprints() {
+ emulate -L zsh
+ local i
+ if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
+ printf 'usage: ssl-cert-fingerprints <file>\n'
+ return 1
+ fi
+ for i in ${ssl_hashes}
+ do ssl-cert-$i $1;
+ done
+}
+
+ssl-cert-info() {
+ emulate -L zsh
+ if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
+ printf 'usage: ssl-cert-info <file>\n'
+ return 1
+ fi
+ openssl x509 -noout -text -in $1
+ ssl-cert-fingerprints $1
+}
+
# }}}
# {{{ make sure our environment is clean regarding colors
--
1.6.5.rc0
|
msg2493 (view) |
Author: ft |
Date: 2009-09-21.10:45:55 |
|
Michael Prokop <bts@bts.grml.org>:
> Frank, can you please review? Maybe we should add some simple usage information
> if $1 is missing?
Yes, I can[tm].
I'd do it like this:
[snip]
ssl_hashes=( sha512 sha256 sha1 md5 )
for sh in ${ssl_hashes}; do
ssl-cert-${sh}() {
emulate -L zsh
if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
printf 'usage: %s <hash-name>\n' "ssh-cert-${sh}"
printf ' where "hash-name" is one of: %s\n' "${ssl_hashes}"
return 1
fi
openssl x509 -noout -fingerprint -${sh} -in $1
}
done
ssl-cert-fingerprints() {
emulate -L zsh
if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
printf 'usage: ssl-cert-fingerprints <file>\n'
return 1
fi
for i in ${ssl_hashes}
do ssl-cert-$i $1;
done
}
ssl-cert-info() {
emulate -L zsh
if [[ -z $1 ]] ; then
printf 'usage: ssl-cert-info <file>\n'
return 1
fi
openssl x509 -noout -text -in $1
ssl-cert-fingerprints $1
}
[snap]
I thinks that's reasonable.
Also note, that I was assuming for ssl-cert-fingerprints() and
ssl-cert-info() to take a *file* as their sole argument. I got no idea
about the workings of openssl. I'm really just a DAU with it.
Anyway, this is my take on the subject.
Regards, Frank
|
msg2492 (view) |
Author: mika |
Date: 2009-09-21.07:16:07 |
|
I can't remember all the openssl stuff on my own, that's why I wrote the
openssl section in grml-tips. :)
Frank, can you please review? Maybe we should add some simple usage information
if $1 is missing?
thx && regards,
-mika-
|
msg2491 (view) |
Author: abe |
Date: 2009-09-21.01:40:39 |
|
I suggest to add the following aliases/functions to grml's zshrc:
for i in sha512 sha256 sha1 md5; do
ssl-cert-$i() { openssl x509 -noout -fingerprint -$i -in $1 }
done
ssl-cert-fingerprints() {
for i in sha512 sha256 sha1 md5; do ssl-cert-$i $1; done
}
ssl-cert-info() {
openssl x509 -noout -text -in $1
ssl-cert-fingerprints $1
}
I never can remember all the options openssl wants for displaying this very
basic information about certificates, so I guess these functions are useful for
others, too.
P.S.: I don't know why, but creating function inside a for loop doesn't seem to
work in bash (3.2). In zsh it just works[tm]. :-)
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-10-14 07:31:19 | mika | set | status: fixed-in-git -> resolved nosy:
mika, ft, abe messages:
+ msg2506 |
2009-09-21 18:34:15 | abe | set | status: resolved -> fixed-in-git nosy:
mika, ft, abe |
2009-09-21 18:32:34 | abe | set | status: chatting -> resolved nosy:
mika, ft, abe |
2009-09-21 12:18:42 | abe | set | files:
+ 0001-Document-ssl-cert-functions.patch nosy:
mika, ft, abe messages:
+ msg2495 |
2009-09-21 11:28:54 | ft | set | nosy:
mika, ft, abe messages:
+ msg2494 |
2009-09-21 10:46:01 | ft | set | nosy:
mika, ft, abe messages:
+ msg2493 |
2009-09-21 07:16:09 | mika | set | status: unread -> chatting nosy:
+ ft, mika messages:
+ msg2492 |
2009-09-21 01:40:42 | abe | create | |
|